Testimony of Ray
Rossman San Antonio Chapter
Director Parents Television
Council at the San Antonio FCC Localism Meeting
Chairman Powell, Commissioners and
fellow panelists, I appreciate and thank you for this opportunity to testify on this
important issue.
Today I represent individuals like
myself -- parents and grandparents who are convinced that our voices are
not being heard by those who have the privilege not the right, the
privilege
-- of
broadcasting into our homes on a nightly basis. We are convinced that our
community standards have been pushed by the wayside. Instead, the broadcasters uphold
the standards of network programmers in
Hollywood or
New
York who have no regard for the impact
or influence their programming has on San Antonio's
children. They admonish us to change the channel if we don't like what
were hearing or seeing. But turning off offensive or indecent programming
should not be our only option. These are our airwaves.
A recent Parents Television
Council survey asked Texans their thoughts about television programming. An overwhelming margin opposes profane,
violent and graphic sexual content on the
public airwaves. They do not believe that local broadcasters consider
community values when making their programming decisions.
Local broadcasters have entirely
subordinated their duty to serve the public
interest by yielding entirely to
the national broadcast networks. It is unclear at this point whether the
subservient behavior of local broadcasters is deliberate or whether it is being forced
upon them by the networks through intense commercial
pressure.
In a PTC survey of network
owned-and-operated
affiliates, not a one told us
it had preempted network programming on the
basis of community standards.
Independently owned affiliates told us that
because of network contractual obligations, they could not preempt network
programming. In fact, some Fox and CBS affiliates said they weren't allowed
to see advance copies of reality programming.
When NBC aired Maxim's Top 100,
26 independent NBC affiliates chose not to telecast the program that many
believed bordered on the on the pornographic and was certainly not in keeping
with their community standards. And yet not one NBC owned and operated
affiliate preempted it based on community standards.
The responsibility to protect our
children from offensive and violent messages is a burden to be shared by
parents, networks, local broadcasters and the FCC. For too long this burden has been
shouldered solely by parents and we simply cannot do it alone. We need the FCC to do its job and we need
local broadcasters to listen to our
concerns.
The FCC can start by severely
penalizing broadcasters who air indecent programming. Licensees should know that their ability to
broadcast is a privilege, not a right. They
should know that their privilege can and will be revoked if they do not abide by
the law. We have heard that many independent affiliates are afraid to preempt
programming because the networks threaten to take away their affiliation
during the next round of contract talks. In an effort to help ease the burden on
independently owned affiliates, the FCC can move to vote on the NASA petition.
A limited number of TV stations
around the country have preempted programming, but in several of those instances
the same show was aired in the same market by a different station that was owned
by the same corporate owner. For
example, when a CBS affiliate refused to
air the Victoria's Secret Fashion Show, Viacom
simply aired the program on the
local UPN affiliate, again without regard for community
standards. So, where is the deference to
community standards?
Broadcasters can start by
listening to the needs and wants of their local communities. We are voting with our remotes, but the networks aren't
listening. The networks repeatedly use
the excuse that they have to compete with cable programming, programming that is
full of sex, violence and foul language. Hogwash.
Hollywood isn't
interested in what America wants,
so our local broadcasters need to be.
We are going to do our part. We are going to contact advertisers to let
them know what their advertising dollars are
sponsoring. We are going to continue to
be vigilant about what our children watch. We are going to
file indecency complaints and file petitions to deny licenses. We are going to continue to fight
for the protection of our children. But
we need your help. We need you to work with licensees
and we need you to hold them accountable.
And, we need broadcasters to listen to our
community standards.
Together we can make a
difference. There is no better time to
start than now.